Free Webinar May 17, 2023
Hanging in the Balance: Discussing the CPRA’s “Catch-All” Exemption
BB&K Free Webinar
Public records and information requests have increased in recent years given our collective dependence on technology, social media and all other forms of electronic communications. Further, responding to requests is now even more time-consuming and complex in the wake of court decisions across the country that affirm that communications on private devices are fair game for the respective state’s public records laws. These decisions further complicate the existing questions of what constitutes a record and how can public agencies retain and produce records that are inherently transitory or ephemeral.
With so many factors at play, the members of Best Best & Krieger’s ARC: Advanced Records Center remain at the forefront in managing records requests of every size. Our team combines legal know-how with cutting-edge technology to provide comprehensive and cost-effective support for records-related matters, including requests for public records.
All-Encompassing Public Records & e-Discovery Support
By seamlessly serving as a full-service extension of our clients’ teams, we enable public agencies to decrease the resources they dedicate to public records and information requests. We solve the problem of staffing amidst records request surges by either supplementing a client’s in-house staff or taking on the request entirely. And our service can expand or contract as quickly as the volume and complexity of records requests. We provide greater consistency, a more efficient process and decreased risk of litigation.
We also have comprehensive experience drafting public records and records retention policies and procedures that public agencies can implement for staff assigned to processing records and information requests. We also provide legal advice and trainings on how to navigate the ever-changing laws related to e-discovery. In today’s web of constantly evolving and new technologies, we advise on the use of public and private electronic devices, and the public’s right to access information, including electronic communications.
The BB&K ARC Difference
We directly take on every step of the process with a formulated and proven approach.
Several questions emerge when a public records request arrives: What records are requested? Where are those records stored? How can the responsive records best be collected and produced? What if the responsive records are stored on personal devices or personal email accounts? Can the request be thoroughly and accurately addressed in time allowed by state or federal statute?
We address these questions by taking the following steps:
Analyze
Since time is of the essence, the initial review and analysis of a request can be the most important. Our rapid response team has the e-discovery experience and credentials needed to analyze requests, determine the exact records being sought and advise on potential big-picture implications.
Collect
We collaborate directly with all departments involved to identify and collect the requested records — even if those records are text messages, photos, videos or messages within personal email accounts. Our approach to document collection is consistent, thorough and completely documented.
Process
After the records are transferred to BB&K, we use sophisticated software to create a search that quickly and efficiently drills down on the target records. This process brings huge cost and time savings, as ARC can rapidly and accurately locate responsive documents at a fraction of the cost of some traditional e-discovery vendors.
Review
We then conduct a vigorous review and if complex legal questions arise, consult with one of our attorneys. The level of review is tailored entirely to clients’ needs and complexity of the requests.
Produce
And finally, we oversee a seamless production of any and all different file types — be it email, text message, spreadsheet or other — within the allotted timeframes.
For more than a century, BB&K has partnered with public agencies to provide clear and accurate legal guidance, especially in areas where the law is novel and evolving. Now, by providing this full-service approach to public records requests and other records-related matters, BB&K steps up again to help clients streamline the process and avoid costly pitfalls.
Full-Service Public Records Act Response, Training and Advice
Helping Public Agencies Prepare and Respond
How BB&K's ARC Helps
BB&K Free Webinar
BB&K Training via Webinar
Municipalities are Being Crushed by the Weight of Records Requests
BB&K’s New Law Guidance for a Well-Informed Start to 2023
BB&K Training via Webinar
AB 473 Takes Effect January 1, 2023, recodifying and reorganizing this important statute
BB&K Training via Webinar
BB&K Partner Christine Wood to Discuss Changes to the California Public Records Act
BB&K Attorneys to Present on Problem Solving, Meeting Minutes, Liability and More at California Special Districts Association’s Board Secretary Clerk Conference
BB&K Attorneys to Present on Tribal Law, E-discovery, Environmental Law, Telecommunications, Federal Government and More
BB&K Attorneys to Present on Brown Act In-Meeting Challenges and Closed Sessions
BB&K Training via Webinar
Christine Wood Details New Law Requiring the Disclosure of Police Records in Daily Journal Article
BB&K's New Law Guidance for a Happy New Year
List Recognizes Advocacy, Perseverance, Legacy and Professional Achievements
Takeaways From Unprecedented Public Records Ruling in Getz v. County of El Dorado
Additional 2022 Leadership Updates Involving Managing Partner and Executive Committee
California Agencies Should Expect to Receive Requests in All New Categories
Comprehensive Discussion of SB 16 Impact
BB&K Attorneys to Present on Language Inclusivity and Public Records Processing
PublicCEO Article on Navigating Developing Challenges Involving Public Records, Social Media and More
SB 16 Signed Into Law by Gov. Gavin Newsom on September 30
Gov. Gavin Newsom Must Sign or Veto by October 10
Profiles in Diversity Journal Recognizes Asian Leaders Worth Watching
City Clerks Association of California's 2021 Annual Conference
The Intersection Between Brady Lists, Pitchess Statutes and SB 1421
BB&K Free Webinar
A Trusted Advisor in the Business of Public Service
Director of PRA Services and e-Discovery Counsel Christine Wood Discusses National Lawyers Guild v. City of Hayward in Sacramento Magazine
Access Depends on if Record Request is from “Elected Official” or “Member of the Public”
New CPRA Case Law and Legislation for 2021
Bills and Court Decisions Impacting Public Agencies and Businesses in the New Year
BB&K Free Webinar
Requesters Must Post an Undertaking if Public Agency Will Suffer Certain Damages During Injunction Proceedings
BB&K Workshop via Webinar
The ARC: Advanced Records Center Leader Recognized by The Recorder
BB&K Workshop via Webinar
BB&K Webinar
BB&K Workshop via Webinar
BB&K's Annie Loo Provides Analysis in Association of E-Discovery Certified Specialists Blog
BB&K Free Webinar
A California Appellate Court Draws a Distinction between the Power of a Court to Rule —“Jurisdiction”— and the Proper Place for a CPRA Suit —“Venue”
It's the Information, Not the Record, that Must be Considered, Say BB&K's Christine Wood and Isaac Rosen in PublicCEO
California Public Records Act Provision Permitting Public Agencies to Charge for “Extraction” Analyzed
BB&K Webinar
BB&K Free Webinar
California Lawyers Association
Drug Company’s Mandatory Release of Price Increase May Compromise Privilege, Permitting Disclosure Under the CPRA
How COVID-19 Stay Home Orders Impact Government Records
California Public Agencies Struggle with CPRA Compliance
BB&K Free Webinar
Police Records Must Be Disclosed Even if Created or Officer Employed By Different Agency, California Appellate Court Says
Part 2: New CPRA Laws for 2020
Part 1: New CPRA Laws for 2020
New Public Agency, California Public Records Act, Education and Labor & Employment Laws
Additional Changes at Firm Reflect Growth, Diversification
BB&K's Christine Wood Gives Updates on AB 748 and SB 1421 in PublicCEO
LAPD Agrees to Requirements Significantly Beyond the CPRA
ARC’s Christine Wood Discusses Calif. Public Records Act Updates in Riverside Lawyer Magazine
Growth Attributed to a Niche Public Law Focus and Great Results
Ventura County Decision Latest to Address Public Release of Police Records
Law360 Annual Ranking Reflects Firm’s Continued Recent Growth
Decision is Binding on All Trial Courts in the State
Firm Expands to Meet Client Demand
California Appellate Court Decision Says Even a Judge Can’t Review Privileged Records
California Appellate Court Ruling in Anderson-Barker v. Superior Court of Los Angeles County
Police Unions’ Argument to Block Release of Pre-2019 Records Found “Legally Unmeritorious”
BB&K’s Christine Wood and Alexander Brand Go In-Depth on SB 1421 in Los Angeles Lawyer Magazine
Legislative and Court Updates Impacting PRA in 2018
Police Unions Obtain Temporary Restraining Orders to Stop Record Disclosures
Information Bulletin Regarding SB 1421 Does Not Impose New Records Retention Requirements
Opinion Confirms Applicability of the Brown Act, Public Records Act, and Conflicts of Interest Laws
The Advanced Records Center Helps Public Agencies Prepare and Respond
How BB&K’s ARC: Advanced Records Center Helps
Full-Service Public Records Act Response, Training and Advice
New and Expanded Services and More Attorneys and Staff Added in 2018
New California Law Increases Access to Records Under PRA
Amendment to California Law Gives Public Agencies More Responsibility to Provide Footage
BB&K Attorneys Christine Wood and HongDao Nguyen Write About Public Officials’ Social Media Use in PublicCEO
Of Counsel
Partner
Government Entities Should Evaluate Data Collection and Use Practices
California Appellate Court Decision National Conference of Black Mayors, et al. v. Chico Community Publishing Company
BB&K's Christine Wood Explores San Jose Ruling Repercussions in PublicCEO
BB&K Attorney Christine Wood Discusses Record Retention Policies in PublicCEO
The BB&K Attorneys Acknowledged Again for Practice Achievements
Legal Decisions and Pending Guideline Updates Have Effect on the CEQA Review Process Write BB&K Attorneys Charity Schiller and Amanda Daams in PublicCEO
Part III: Pasadena Police Officers Association v. City of Pasadena
Part II: Pasadena Police Officers Association v. City of Pasadena
Part I: Pasadena Police Officers Association v. City of Pasadena
BB&K Attorney Jessica Lomakin Writes on Public Records Act Requests for PublicCEO
PublicCEO
Legislative Changes Impacting Employers
Cannabis, LAFCO Law and a Round Up of Other New Laws Impacting Public Agencies
Housing and Land Use, Environment, Public Property/Public Works and Economic Development
Elections, Public Records Act, Revenue and Conflicts of Interest
BB&K Announces Promotions
By clicking “Agree,” you agree to the storing of cookies on your device to enhance website navigation, analyze website usage and assist in our marketing efforts. View our Cookie Notice here.