Legal Alerts Jul 31, 2019
City’s Ability to Keep Firearms Away From Dangerous Individuals Affirmed
Ninth Circuit Determines City Did Not Have to Return guns to Wife Because Husband Posed Threat
Associate
Los Angeles
300 South Grand Ave.,
25th Floor
Los Angeles, CA 90071
Office (213) 617-8100
Fax (213) 617-7480
Alex represents private and public clients in litigation in both state and federal court.
He has extensive experience representing public entities in high-exposure and complex litigation.
Alex’s litigation practice includes trial level and appellate work.
Alex Brand represents public and private clients in litigation in state and federal courts. He is an associate in the Municipal Law practice group of Best Best & Krieger LLP’s Los Angeles office.
Prior to joining BB&K, Alex was a litigation associate at a California firm where he primarily represented public entity clients in high-exposure complex litigation matters. Based on Alex’s prior experience, he is aware of the unique concerns that public entities have with litigation — especially when there is a high risk of monetary or publicity exposure.
During law school, Alex was a member of the Scott Moot Court National competition team where he had the opportunity to argue in front of sitting judges during competitions.
Alex is admitted to the U.S. District Court for the Central District of California and the U.S. Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals.
Education
Admissions
Ninth Circuit Determines City Did Not Have to Return guns to Wife Because Husband Posed Threat
BB&K’s Christine Wood and Alexander Brand Go In-Depth on SB 1421 in Los Angeles Lawyer Magazine
Police Unions Obtain Temporary Restraining Orders to Stop Record Disclosures
Alexander Brand Discusses California Appellate Court Ruling in PublicCEO
BB&K Attorneys Cathy Ta and Alexander Brand Write in Riverside Lawyer Magazine
California Appellate Court Finds Limit Did Not Violate Brown Act or First Amendment
Cathy Ta and Alexander Brand Explore the Lines in Riverside Lawyer Magazine
California Court of Appeal Reverses $14 million Judgment Against Employer Because Employee’s Vehicle was Not Required at Work on the Day of the Accident
BB&K Attorneys Cathy Ta and Alexander Brand Write in Riverside Lawyer Magazine
California Court of Appeal Applies Anti-SLAPP Statute to Some Causes of Action and City Defendants
Appellate Opinion Stems from Disputed Construction Permits
By clicking “Agree,” you agree to the storing of cookies on your device to enhance website navigation, analyze website usage and assist in our marketing efforts. View our Cookie Notice here.