Gene Tanaka


Tel: (925) 977-3301


At a Glance

Gene represents municipalities and other public agencies in a myriad of environmental and hazardous waste issues.
He has more than 35 years of experience representing public agencies, and understands that litigation reflects the public’s concerns.
Northern California Super Lawyers has recognized Gene for Environmental Litigation every year since 2011.

Gene Tanaka’s practice focuses on environmental, land use and public agency litigation. A partner at Best Best & Krieger LLP, he works to reduce the uncertainty of litigation by providing his clients with case analyses and budgets at the outset and taking a measured, consistent approach throughout the case.

Environmental Litigation 
Environmental litigation can be complicated, protracted and very expensive. Early preparation and evaluation are key to obtaining favorable results and efficiently directing experts and discovery. Gene has taken this approach in a wide range of environmental matters.

  • Clean Water Act and Resource Conservation and Recovery Act: Represented the City of Merced in an action brought by approximately 2,200 plaintiffs for alleged chemical and biological contamination, CWA and RCRA violations, and flood damages. The City obtained dismissal of the CWA and RCRA claims and settled on favorable terms.
  • Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act: Represented the City of Colton in approximately 10 federal and state lawsuits, in litigation lasting nearly 10 years, over perchlorate groundwater contamination. The cases settled with Colton recovering almost all of its damages, and the responsible parties funding a nearly $100 million cleanup.
  • California Hazardous Substances Account Act: Represents Los Angeles County before the California Department of Toxic Substances Control regarding the cleanup of the former BKK Carson Landfill and cost recovery from numerous public agencies and private entities.
  • Water Law: Represented North Kern Water Storage District as co-counsel in a three-month bench trial concerning pre-1914 appropriative water rights. North Kern prevailed on appeal. North Kern Water Storage District v. Kern Delta Water District, 147 Cal. App. 4th 555 (2007).
  • California Radiation Control Law and Federal Land Policy and Management Act: Represented the City of Needles in two related lawsuits that helped prevent the licensing of a low-level radioactive waste facility at Ward Valley, Calif. 

Land Use Litigation 
Public agencies must balance the rights of project applicants with protecting their land use policies. Gene helped public and private clients strike the right balance in many different land use lawsuits. 

  • Fair Housing Act and Civil Rights Act: Plaintiffs claimed a regulatory taking and violations of the Civil Rights Act and FHA regarding the City of Claremont’s implementation of its sewer policy and its opposition to plaintiffs’ Alzheimer’s facility. After a six-day jury trial, the jury found for the City. The City prevailed on all claims after an appeal to the Ninth Circuit. Sanghvi, et al. v. City of Claremont, et al., 328 F.3d 532 (9th Cir. 2003).
  • Regulatory Takings: Lockheed Martin sued the Riverside County Habitat Conservation Agency, Riverside County and seven cities for $90 million claiming that their endangered species habitat conservation plans amounted to a regulatory taking and other legal violations. All claims except the permanent takings claim were dismissed by the trial court and court of appeal. Defendants settled the permanent takings claim by purchasing the property close to their appraised value with mostly state funding.
  • California Endangered Species Act: Successfully represented RCHCA, Riverside County and seven cities in defending a habitat conservation plan for an endangered species under the CESA. San Bernardino Valley Audubon Society v. City of Moreno Valley, 44 Cal.App.4th 593 (1996).
  • Mello Roos Act: Plaintiff challenged Riverside County’s formation of a district under the Mello Roos Act. Gene successfully defended the County before the trial court and court of appeal. New Davidson Brick Co. v. County of Riverside, 217 Cal.App.3d 1146 (1990). 

Public Agency Litigation
Public agency litigation often reflects the concerns of the public, whom we serve. With nearly 30 years of experience representing public agencies, Gene understands this dynamic and has had the good fortune to handle many high profile, unique cases. 

  • First Amendment: A neighborhood association sued for access to Riverside Unified School District’s elementary school under the First Amendment. After two appeals to the U.S. Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals, the parties settled the case.
  • 1965 Voting Rights Act: Defended the Merced County Local Agency Formation Commission in a federal court case regarding the Voting Rights Act of 1965. LAFCO prevailed on a motion to dismiss.
  • California Cartwright Act: Defended the Cucamonga Valley Water District in an antitrust lawsuit regarding its ownership of a mutual water company. Following class certification and extensive discovery, CVWD settled with mostly insurance proceeds. 
  • Gene taught trial advocacy and deposition skills for the National Institute of Trial Advocacy and others in Boulder, Col.; Denver, Col.; Des Moines, Iowa; San Diego, Calif.; Belfast, Ireland; Osaka, Japan; Geneva, Switzerland; Vienna, Austria; and Hobart, Australia.


  • Columbia Law School, Columbia University, J.D.
  • Columbia College, Columbia University, B.A., political science


  • California
COVID-19 Orders: Government Takings?
Authored Articles & Publications Jul 06, 2020

COVID-19 Orders: Government Takings?

In Law360, BB&K's Gene Tanaka and Emily Chaidez Evaluate if COVID-19 Orders are Temporary Takings

Takings Decision by SCOTUS Expected to Create More Litigation for Public Agencies
Authored Articles & Publications Oct 23, 2019

Takings Decision by SCOTUS Expected to Create More Litigation for Public Agencies

Partner Gene Tanaka Analyzes Knick v. Scott in Law360

California Issues the Nation’s Strictest Notice Levels for PFAS in Drinking Water
Legal Alerts Sep 03, 2019

California Issues the Nation’s Strictest Notice Levels for PFAS in Drinking Water

New Response Thresholds and Regulations in the Works for Public Water Suppliers

Blue is the New Red in Federalism
Authored Articles & Publications May 08, 2019

Blue is the New Red in Federalism

Partner Gene Tanaka Discusses a Flip in the States’ Rights Discussion in Municipal Lawyer

Endangered Fish v. Humans: The Fight Over Competing Water Needs
Authored Articles & Publications Nov 09, 2016

Endangered Fish v. Humans: The Fight Over Competing Water Needs

The Struggle to Find Balance is Explored by BB&K Partner Gene Tanaka in Municipal Lawyer Magazine

  • “Role Reversal as Golden States Takes the Federalism Reins,” Daily Journal, May 24, 2019
  • “Deposing Expert Witnesses,” Daily Journal, Jan. 24, 2017
  • What If We Have Too Much Water: El Niño and Flood DamagesPublicCEO, Oct. 27, 2015 (via BBKnowledge)
  • “Double Jeopardy and More: Citizen Suits Under The Clean Water Act,” IMLA’s Municipal Lawyer, March/April 2013
  • “What The Frack – Legal Liability for Hydraulic Fracturing,” California Bar Journal, Summer 2012 (co-authored with Shawn Hagerty)
  • “Walking the Tightrope Over Stormwater Management and Liability,” California Bar Journal, Fall 2011 (co-authored with Shawn Hagerty)
  • “Finding The Missing Link of Toxic Torts: Using ‘Cottle’ Orders to Determine Causation,” California Environmental Law Reporter, December 2010

Contact Gene Tanaka

Cookie Consent

By clicking “Agree,” you agree to the storing of cookies on your device to enhance website navigation, analyze website usage and assist in our marketing efforts. View our Cookie Notice here.